Watch the walkthrough

The whole product, on one real case.

Three minutes on In re Luckin Coffee Inc. Securities Litigation (S.D.N.Y.), the fabricated-sales case. Every screen is the working product on the public record: the extracted facts, a live event study on Luckin's actual prices, the four-part Exposure & Settlement Brief, citations opened at the page, and a live cross-examination of the opposing expert.

Public-record example. The firm and user shown are fictitious.

Narrated. Press play, and keep the sound on: the voiceover carries the analysis.

Download the walkthrough MP4 · 1440p · 42 MBOpen it full size ↗
What changes

The same matter, with and without the simulation.

Retaining an expert is a single, late, indivisible decision: one expert, one reading of the facts, arriving on the disclosure calendar. Everything downstream is gated by it. A simulation separates the analysis from the retention, which changes when you see the other side's case and how many readings of it you can afford to test. The cost lines below are measured on securities dockets. They describe the first strategic read of a served report, not the whole engagement: a retained economist on a single securities matter commonly bills $150,000 to $600,000, and the comparison below deliberately does not use that number.

Without Supreme Mind
With Supreme Mind
When you first see the opposing expert's case
When their report is served. Rule 26(a)(2)(D) then allows 30 days to put in a rebuttal.
At intake, before you commit to the matter.
Readings of the facts you can put on the table
One. A second reading of the same record means a second retention.
Every expert the matter supports, run side by side.
Cost of the first strategic read
$25,000 to $45,000 in securities. A 25 to 40 hour opening workup at the $1,148.61 an hour defense-side economists command on these dockets.
$50.
Time to that read
Weeks. The conflicts check, engagement letter and retainer all precede the first hour of analysis.
minutes.
Cost to evaluate a matter you may decline
Whatever you have already committed to the expert.
$50.
Cross-examination rehearsed before the deposition
Not available. You find out where the expert bends in the deposition.
NewUnlimited, against the same expert you will face.
Rule 702 challenge drafted against precedent
Expert-assisted, and usually only once you have decided to move.
NewOn every matter, with each authority checked and the gaps named.

Hourly rates from Callister, Granato and Pang, Expert Asymmetry: Evidence From Securities Litigation, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (2026): 1,289 expert appearances, 2008 to 2018, inflation adjusted to 2024. Securities dockets only. Supreme Mind figures are list prices.

See it run on one of your matters.

Bring a complaint or a served expert report from a live case and we will run it together, on a call. Twenty minutes is enough to see whether it earns a place on your desk.

Book a demoStart freePrefer to read? The sample brief

What the walkthrough covers.

0:08

By the numbers

What a senior expert's first weeks cost, against one simulation.

0:21

The matter

In re Luckin Coffee. Upload the consolidated complaint; the facts are extracted.

0:34

The overview

Corrective disclosures, the opposing expert, a live event study on real prices, and the judicial record on the method.

1:24

The brief

Likely opinion, ranked cross-examination weaknesses, the Daubert attack surface, and a settlement range.

2:03

Citations

Every quote opened at its page of the record, and every Rule 702 authority read in full from CourtListener.

2:32

The witness

A live cross-examination against the same expert, before the deposition.

2:43

The record

Ask the file anything and get answers cited page by page. When the record is silent, it says so.

2:52

Tools

Attach the served report and the whole brief re-aims at its methodology, or red-team your own expert.

Questions before a call? Write to richard@suprememind.ai.