What one run returns

The brief

Four sections in every brief

  • Likely opinion: what the expert will conclude, in their own voice
  • Cross-examination weaknesses: ranked, with citations to the case file
  • Methodology challenges: the Daubert and Rule 702 attack surface
  • Settlement range: how the testimony moves it, uncertainty stated
The tools

Put it to work

  • Cross-examination practice: rehearse the cross against their expert or your own
  • Expert-report stress test: find the weak points in a report before it is served
  • Examine the record: ask the case file a question, get an answer cited to the page
Read a sample brief →
Tested blind on real expert reports

Nearly three times as accurate as general-purpose models

28%

General-purpose models with the case file

78%

Supreme Mind, with the expert’s data, methods and record

Share of the expert’s key findings reproduced without seeing the report. Same model and instructions in both; only the information changed. 80% interval on the gain: +37 to +60 points. How we tested it

The walkthrough

A walkthrough of one real case

The live cross · worked example

Put the expert on the stand before the deposition

In re Luckin Coffee Inc. Securities LitigationGrounded
Class period 2019-05-17 to 2020-04-01 · vs. Defense Event-Study Econometrician
You (counsel)

Your market model for January 31 produced an R-squared of 0.123. Correct?

Witness

That figure appears in my report.

1 of 5 questions asked.

A class of expert, never a named individual. Nothing here is filed or offered as testimony.

Your data

How we handle privileged material

Security & trust →

Never used for training

Your matter content trains no model, ours or anyone else's.

US processing with zero data retention

Model calls run under zero data retention, with US inference. No prompt or completion is stored.

Isolated per firm

Only your firm's named users can reach your matters. Privileged content is never written to a log.

Never filed

Internal preparation only. Your retained expert still writes, signs and testifies.

The asymmetry

The same expert read, in minutes and at a fraction of the cost

What an expert's first read costs
By hand
$25,000 to $45,000
Supreme Mind
$50500 to 900 times less, drawn to scale
What an expert's first read takes
By hand
2 to 3 weeks
Supreme Mind
Minutesthousands of times faster
See it on your own matter.Start freeRead a sample brief →
Who gets an expert

Expert strategy for every matter you take on

Which matters get a read

A senior expert's first read runs to tens of thousands of dollars, so it is bought only for the matters that can carry it.

When, and how often, you get a read

Without, an expert weighs in a few times over a matter that can run for years. With, you can ask any day, at any hour, and have an answer in minutes.

Without: about 1 in 8 federal cases ever deposes an expert
With Supreme Mind
Without
IntakePleadingsDiscoveryExpert reportsDaubertResolution
An expert readA read you went without
With Supreme Mind
IntakePleadingsDiscoveryExpert reportsDaubertResolution
A read on demand, daily if you want it
Where it fits

From complaint to settlement

Stage
Without
With Supreme Mind
What improves
Case intake
Decided on the pleadings
A read before you commit
Case value rangeLower intake risk
Motion to dismiss
Their case inferred
Their case written out
Foresight
Expert retention
Sourced through networks
Retain against a brief
Sharper assignment
Discovery
One billed read
Rerun as the facts land
Live case theoryRerun whenever you need
Expert reports
Their report seen for the first time
Their attack prepared for
Stress-tested expertWeeks saved
Depositions
Cross built from reports
Cross rehearsed first
Practised cross
Daubert
Exposure found in their motion
Weak points found first
Fewer surprises
Resolution
Leverage arrives late
Leverage from intake
A range you can defend
Your retained expert still forms the opinion, signs the report and takes the stand.
Preparation compoundsRun it daily. Preparation predicts performance.
Without, it comes in stepsIt starts once an expert is retained, and grows as each paid engagement allows.
What it could be worth

How preparation changes the outcome

Close contested class certification fight · $300M single-damages overcharge. Both sides start at 50/50; “with” means that side prepares with Supreme Mind.

Plaintiff chance of winning
Defense without
Defense with
Plaintiff without
50%Baseline
45.2%−4.8 pts · range 40–48%
Plaintiff with
57.2%+7.2 pts · range 53–64%
52.4%+2.4 pts · range 48–56%
Expected recovery
Defense without
Defense with
Plaintiff without
$32.5MBaseline
$29.2M−10.1%
Plaintiff with
$37.3M+14.7%
$33.8M+4.1%

An estimate based on public research. Find out more about how we modeled this →

Be the side that prepares better.Start freeBook a demo →
Why now

The seventh revolution in law

Six times before, the material got easier to find. The seventh is the first that does the analysis.

450 BC
The Twelve Tables
529
Corpus Juris Civilis
1450s
The printing press
1870s
The reporters
1973
Full-text search
2012
Machine review
2025
Machine reasoning

Nine hundred and seventy-nine years separated the first two. Thirteen separated the last two.

Read the whole arc →
What comes nextIn development

How the settlement range is built

We are building a settlement engine. It argues your matter out across a thousand scenarios, your experts against theirs, agent against agent, and returns one strategic recommendation: the spread of outcomes, what the best five percent share and what the worst quarter share.

Downside cut: the paths that go wrong, avoided.Top 5%: where to press. Build strategy from these.Downside cutpaths that go wrong, avoidedMedian outcomeTop 5%where to pressWorse outcomeBetter outcome
One read todayActing on the engine’s recommendation
Illustrative. The engine’s effect has not yet been measured on resolved matters.
Top 5%: where your leverage is

The arguments, experts and witnesses behind the best scenarios. Build your strategy from them.

Bottom quarter: what to avoid

The paths that go wrong across the scenarios, found before you settle.

The spread itself

Which assumption or witness moves the range most, so the settlement number you defend comes with its full distribution.

Pilots shape what we build →
Practice areas

Practice areas we cover in depth

Each library covers the experts, methods and Daubert patterns that define a practice area.

See it free on a matter you know