Decades of commercial damages, custom-and-practice, and forensic-accounting expertise, generated as a structured strategic artifact in ~60 to 90 seconds. Likely opinion, cross-examination weaknesses, methodology challenges, settlement-range implications. Across every contract, partnership, and arbitration matter.
Individual simulations are $50 each. Firms run on credit plans with volume pricing; example cases are always free.
Commercial litigation runs on a different archetype mix than securities or PI. Damages-quantum experts and industry custom-and-practice testifiers carry the technical load. Fact witnesses (CFOs, sales executives, contract negotiators, partners in dissolution) carry the credibility load. Supreme Mind's archetype simulation returns the same strategic artifact for both: likely opinion, ranked cross weaknesses, methodology challenges, settlement-range implications. Frontier-AI reasoning, public-record training data, $50 per simulation. The credentialed human expert remains essential at deposition and trial. The first 50% of the workflow does not.
The named-expert and witness archetypes that anchor commercial practice. Sequenced for first build against the most-frequently-encountered patterns in contract, partnership, and arbitration matters.
We're opening a small number of early-access pilots with senior trial partners at commercial litigation boutiques and AmLaw practices. One named matter, your choice. Public-record training data only. Direct line to the founding team. Pipeline pull moves the queue.
Request early access →The deliverable is the Exposure & Settlement Brief: four artifacts, every supporting quote verified against the public record.
Set up the case and upload documents. The file is extracted and available to the analysis.
Add one or more de-identified expert archetypes: the opposing expert, or your own retained expert.
Ground the analysis in extraction from your uploaded case documents: expert reports, depositions, and filings in the matter.
Produce the Exposure & Settlement Brief: likely opinion, cross-examination weaknesses, methodology challenges (Daubert / FRE 702), and settlement-range implications.
Every supporting quote is checked verbatim against public-record sources. Quotes that cannot be verified are dropped, not guessed.
Rehearse the exchange against the archetype before the deposition: question, answer, follow-up.
Put a question to the case file, the complaint, the opposing report, the brief, and get an answer cited to the page, read as the opposing expert would. When the record is silent, it says so instead of guessing.
Attack an opposing report for its weak points, or red-team your own retained expert's draft before it is served.
Export to Word, a Daubert-motion outline, and a cross-examination outline, plus PDF, copy, and email. Deliverable history is retained.
Where warranted, optionally overlay a specific expert's public judicial record. Admin-controlled, not on by default.
Matter content is handled as privileged material end to end: where it runs, where it is stored, and what is ever written to a log.
Magic-link sign-in tied to a named person: a one-time link to a work email. No password to phish or manage.
Firm accounts with a firm-admin role and self-service team management across multiple devices.
The model runs server-side. The browser never holds an API key.
Inference is US-pinned and routed only through Zero-Data-Retention-eligible endpoints. Matter content is not used to train third-party models.
Per-firm data isolation in a US-region database; uploaded documents in a US-region store.
Metadata-only audit logging; privileged content is never logged. Deleted matters are removed after a 30-day recovery window.
Pilots add SSO, RBAC, immutable audit logging, and a signed Anthropic data processing addendum (DPA) plus Zero-Data-Retention addendum.