Supreme Mind builds expert-witness expert libraries vertical by vertical. Each library covers the named experts, methodology canon, and Daubert-vulnerable patterns that define that practice area. We go deep where we go, and we say honestly where we are not yet.
Ten experts covering roughly 85% of expert witness types retained in Section 10(b) and Delaware Chancery cases. Defense and plaintiff event-study econometricians, class-certification and price-impact economists, forensic accountants, valuation and fairness-opinion economists, governance and executive-compensation experts.
Antitrust cases run through the economists. Cartel and common-impact econometricians, overcharge and pass-through, monopolization and market-definition, merger effects, and industrial organization, grounded in a real cost pass-through on public FRED series.
Mass-tort practice runs on shared methodology applied across hundreds of plaintiffs. Causation toxicologists, industrial hygienists, epidemiologists, OB-nursing experts, and the "every-exposure" Daubert weapon (Krik v. Exxon, Bostic, Anderson) across asbestos, talc, PFAS, and Roundup dockets. Build the methodology once. Apply it across the entire docket.
Anchored on the foundational biomechanical expert, the highest-priority cluster in the taxonomy. Lifetime-earnings economists, hedonic-damages economists, life-care planners, MRI radiologists, neuropsychologists, accident reconstructionists. Build the expert once, reuse it across every catastrophic-injury matter.
Cross-rehearsal infrastructure for high-stakes commercial trials. Contract-interpretation experts, damages quantum specialists, industry-custom-and-practice testifiers, and the fact-witness rehearsal layer that runs across every commercial matter, from partnership dissolution to spoliation hearings to FAA arbitration.
Reasonable-royalty damages, technical-expert claim construction, independent-invention defense, and Markman hearing dynamics. High expert density given how concentrated the testifying population is in patent damages.
General- and specific-causation toxicologists, industrial-hygiene experts, and exposure-science specialists. The 'every-exposure' Daubert cross (Krik v. Exxon, Bostic, Anderson) is the gold-standard methodology weapon across this cluster.
SOX whistleblower retaliation, Title VII discrimination, performance-based termination, and wage-hour class actions. Witness-credibility experts for HR executives, managers, and reluctant fact witnesses.
Coverage-attorney experts, claims-handling specialists, and bad-faith damages economists. The fast-evolving 'reasonable expectations' doctrine and duty-to-defend disputes that anchor most coverage litigation.
Surgical-specialty standard-of-care experts, causation specialists, and damages life-care planners. The OB-nursing / birth-injury cluster overlaps the mass-tort build, so the experts are among the cheapest here to stand up. It sits last for a reason that has nothing to do with the work: standard-of-care testimony is effectively mandatory, but the buyers are thousands of small firms rather than a concentrated bar, so it is the hardest of these to reach.
A small number of expert classes account for most of what is said on a stand in US civil litigation, and the tail beyond them is long and thin. That is what makes a library a finite thing to build, and it is why the order of the build matters more than its size.
About half of all civil expert testimony, because the head of the distribution is very heavy.
Four fifths. The body of medical, engineering and financial testimony is covered.
Ninety percent and the practical ceiling. Past this, each addition buys less than a tenth of a percent.
The 500-expert taxonomy is the master plan. Build sequencing is shaped by where the pipeline pulls. If your practice is on the roadmap and you have a matter in flight, that moves the queue.
Tell us your practice area and the matter you're prepping. We'll respond within 24 hours.