Supreme Mind AISupreme Mind
SecuritiesAntitrustMass TortPICommercialAll practice areasWatch the walkthrough
Sign inRequest access

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers to the questions litigators and their firms ask before adopting Supreme Mind. For the binding terms see our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; for the security posture in depth see Security & trust.

Security & data

Where does our matter data live, and who can access it?

Firm accounts are stored in a US-region Postgres database and a US-region file store, isolated per firm at the row level. Only your firm's authenticated users can reach your matters, and no other firm can ever see them. Sign-in is passwordless and tied to a named individual.

Do you use our data to train AI models?

No. Model calls are pinned to US inference geography and routed only through Zero-Data-Retention-eligible endpoints, and we do not use your matter content, or any privileged material, to train third-party foundation models.

How do you protect privilege and confidentiality?

You decide what to upload. Content is firm-isolated and US-stored, model calls run through ZDR-eligible endpoints, and every call writes a metadata-only audit record (who, when, which task, which model and region). Privileged content is never written to logs.

Can we delete our data, and undo an accidental delete?

Yes. Deleting a matter removes it, its uploaded documents, and the deliverables generated from it after a 30-day recovery window. Within that window the matter can be restored, by the person who deleted it or by a firm administrator, so a mistaken delete is reversible.

The experts

Are the experts real people?

No. Each archetype is a de-identified composite representing a class of expert witness, anchored to publicly documented methods and prior testimony. It is not any specific named individual and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any real expert or firm.

What is an archetype, exactly?

A probabilistic synthesis of how a class of expert testifies, for example a defense event-study econometrician or a cartel-overcharge damages economist, bounded to the public record. Supreme Mind uses it to model the opposing expert's likely opinion, cross-examination weaknesses, and Daubert exposure on your matter.

Which practice areas are covered?

Securities litigation (Section 10(b) and Delaware Chancery) and antitrust are live, with ten securities and six antitrust archetypes. Mass tort, personal injury, and commercial litigation are in active build; intellectual property, medical malpractice, and others are on the roadmap.

Methodology & accuracy

Is this just a language model guessing?

No. The analysis is grounded in real data: event-study econometrics on market prices for securities matters, a cost pass-through analysis on public FRED input-cost series for antitrust, and Daubert and prior-testimony records from public court filings. Supporting quotations are verified against the public source, and any that cannot be verified are dropped.

Can we rely on the output in court?

Treat it as decision-support, not legal advice. Counsel of record retains full professional responsibility, a credentialed human still testifies, and you should independently verify every fact, citation, quotation, and figure before use.

How do you know the simulations are any good?

We backtest archetype output against publicly reported case outcomes to measure calibration, and every brief shows the data it is grounded in so you can trace any figure or claim back to its source.

Access, pricing & control

Who at our firm can see our matters?

Matters are firm-scoped by design: your team shares one case file and collaborates on it, rather than each person keeping a private copy. Firm administrators manage users and firm-wide controls such as bulk deletion and recovery.

How is Supreme Mind priced?

Work is billed in credits. A full Exposure and Settlement Brief is a single run, and lighter tasks such as cross-examination and record examination are priced below that in proportion to the computation they use. Current pricing is provided on request or in your order, and pilots are scoped per firm.

Is our data ever shared with other firms?

No. Isolation is per firm, and the outputs generated for you are yours. We may generate similar outputs for other users from the same public record, but your content is never exposed to anyone outside your firm.

Getting started

How do we start?

Most firms begin with a 30-day pilot on one named matter: upload the case file, choose the opposing expert archetype, and generate the brief. Request access from the site and we will set up your firm.

What do you need from us to run a matter?

The public case materials you already have, such as the complaint, the opposing expert's report, and key filings, plus the basic facts of the case. Supreme Mind extracts the facts and grounds the analysis from there.

Have a question that is not answered here? Email [email protected].

Supreme Mind AISupreme Mind
Decades of expert intelligence.
In minutes.
Verticals
  • Securities
  • Antitrust
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Commercial
  • All practice areas
Company
  • Security & trust
  • Watch the walkthrough
  • FAQ
  • LinkedIn
  • [email protected]
  • Request access
© 2026 Supreme Mind AI, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy