Decades of biomechanical, medical, and economic-damages expertise, generated as a brief in minutes. Likely opinion, cross-examination weaknesses, methodology challenges, settlement-range implications. Build the expert once. Reuse it across every catastrophic-injury and wrongful-death matter the firm tries.
Individual simulations are $50 each. Example cases are free on a firm email address, and firms run on credit plans with volume pricing. See pricing.
Single-plaintiff PI doesn't carry the volume coordination of mass tort, but it carries higher per-case stakes. One plaintiff, one trial day, one jury. The defense biomech engineer's FEA mesh choices, the life-care planner's pediatric-care assumptions, the economist's discount-rate selection: every one of these is a single point where the case is won or lost. Supreme Mind's a simulation returns the same brief a senior expert builds across the first weeks of an engagement: likely opinion, ranked cross weaknesses, methodology challenges, settlement-range implications. The credentialed human expert remains essential at deposition and trial. The strategic read that used to precede retaining one no longer does.
The experts that anchor single-plaintiff PI practice. Significant overlap with the mass-tort cluster (same biomech engineer, same economist, same life-care planner), tuned for single-plaintiff trial dynamics rather than MDL coordination.
We're opening early access to a small number of firms: senior trial partners at PI and serious-injury practices. One named matter, your choice. Public-record training data only. Direct line to the founding team. Pipeline pull moves the queue; if your matter is in flight, the expert it needs gets prioritized.
Request early access →The deliverable is the Exposure & Settlement Brief: four sections, every supporting quote verified against the public record.
Set up the case and upload documents. The file is extracted and available to the analysis.
Add one or more de-identified experts: the opposing expert, or your own retained expert.
Ground the analysis in extraction from your uploaded case documents: expert reports, depositions, and filings in the matter.
Produce the Exposure & Settlement Brief: likely opinion, cross-examination weaknesses, methodology challenges (Daubert / FRE 702), and settlement-range implications.
Every supporting quote is checked verbatim against public-record sources. Quotes that cannot be verified are dropped, not guessed.
Rehearse the exchange against the expert before the deposition: question, answer, follow-up.
Put a question to the case file, the complaint, the opposing report, the brief, and get an answer cited to the page, read as the opposing expert would. When the record is silent, it says so instead of guessing.
Attack an opposing report for its weak points, or red-team your own retained expert's draft before it is served.
Export to Word, a Daubert-motion outline, and a cross-examination outline, plus PDF, copy, and email. Deliverable history is retained.
Where warranted, optionally overlay a specific expert's public judicial record. Admin-controlled, not on by default.
Matter content is handled as privileged material end to end: where it runs, where it is stored, and what is ever written to a log.
Magic-link sign-in tied to a named person: a one-time link to a work email. No password to phish or manage.
Firm accounts with a firm-admin role and self-service team management across multiple devices.
The model runs server-side. The browser never holds an API key.
Inference is US-pinned and routed only through Zero-Data-Retention-eligible endpoints. Matter content is not used to train third-party models.
Per-firm data isolation in a US-region database; uploaded documents in a US-region store.
Metadata-only audit logging; privileged content is never logged. Deleted matters are removed after a 30-day recovery window.
Pilots add SSO, RBAC, immutable audit logging, and a signed Anthropic data processing addendum (DPA) plus Zero-Data-Retention addendum.