1
Brief, built once at MDL scale and reused in every case that turns on the same expert fight.
$50
Cost of a Supreme Mind simulation. One run, read across the whole docket.
8
Mass-tort experts in the roster, from causation toxicology and epidemiology to pharmacovigilance, product defect and trucking safety.
The thesis

Mass tort is methodology compounding at scale. The same expert, the same brief, across the docket

For coordinating counsel the compression is multiplicative: the same expert pattern, such as the every-exposure causation fight across asbestos, talc, PFAS and Roundup, repeats across thousands of matters. Build the brief once at MDL scale and every downstream filing changes.

How it works

One brief per matter, grounded in the record

One brief in four sections, every quote verified against the public record.

01

Create a matter

Set up the case and upload the file.

02

Add experts

Add the opposing expert, or your own.

03

Ground it

Ground it in your case documents: expert reports, depositions and filings.

04

Generate the brief

Opinion, cross weaknesses, Daubert challenges and settlement range, in minutes.

Verbatim citation verification

Every quote checked against the public record. Unverifiable quotes are dropped.

Cross-examination practice simulation

Rehearse the cross against the expert before the deposition.

Examine the record

Ask the case file a question and get an answer cited to the page, or told the record is silent.

Expert-report stress test

Find the weak points in an opposing report, or red-team your own expert's draft.

Exports built for the file

Word, PDF, a Daubert-motion outline and a cross outline, with history kept.

Named-expert overlay

Optionally add a named expert's public judicial record. Off by default.

Who gets an expert

Expert analysis for matters that could never pay for it

Which matters get a read

A senior expert's first read runs to tens of thousands of dollars, so it is bought only for the matters that can carry it.

When, and how often, you get a read

Without, an expert weighs in a few times over a matter that can run for years. With, you can ask any day, at any hour, and have an answer in minutes.

Without: about 1 in 8 federal cases ever deposes an expert
With Supreme Mind
Without
IntakePleadingsDiscoveryExpert reportsDaubertResolution
An expert readA read you went without
With Supreme Mind
IntakePleadingsDiscoveryExpert reportsDaubertResolution
A read on demand, daily if you want it
Where it fits

From complaint to settlement

Stage
Without
With Supreme Mind
What improves
Case intake
Decided on the pleadings
A read before you commit
Case value rangeLower intake risk
Pleadings
Their defense inferred
Their defense written out
Foresight
Expert retention
Sourced through networks
Retain against a brief
Sharper assignment
Discovery
One billed read
Rerun as the records land
Live case theoryRerun whenever you need
Expert reports
Their report seen for the first time
Their attack prepared for
Stress-tested expertWeeks saved
Depositions
Cross built from reports
Cross rehearsed first
Practised cross
Daubert
Exposure found in their motion
Weak points found first
Fewer surprises
Resolution
Leverage arrives late
Leverage from intake
A range you can defend
Your retained expert still forms the opinion, signs the report and takes the stand.
Preparation compoundsRun it daily. Preparation predicts performance.
Without, it comes in stepsIt starts once an expert is retained, and grows as each paid engagement allows.
See it on your own matter.Start freeRead a sample brief →
The library

The mass-tort experts you are most likely to face

The experts that anchor mass-tort practice, each a composite built from public testimony and Daubert rulings, never a named individual.

O-016 · Flagship
Causation Toxicologist (General & Specific)
The "every-exposure" theory, excluded in Krik and Anderson and held insufficient in Bostic. The core cross across asbestos, talc, silica and PFAS.
O-017
Industrial Hygienist (Asbestos / Silica)
Exposure modeling, dose reconstruction and OSHA limits.
O-030
Epidemiologist (PFAS / Roundup / Talc)
Bradford Hill, dose-response, confounding and the relative-risk threshold.
M-082
Pharmacology / Pharmacovigilance
Drug causation, FAERS signals and label adequacy.
E-024
Product Defect Engineer
Crashworthiness, alternative design and failure-mode analysis.
E-001
Biomechanical Engineer
Shared with personal injury, for matters with traumatic-injury components.
Security and trust

Security and confidentiality

Matter content is treated as privileged end to end.

Passwordless sign-in

A one-time link to a named work email. No password to phish.

Firm accounts & admin

A firm-admin role and self-service team management.

Server-side model

The browser never holds an API key.

US processing with zero data retention

Anthropic, under zero data retention, with US inference. Nothing is stored or used for training.

Per-firm US-region isolation

Each firm's data and documents kept separate, in the US.

Metadata-only audit; 30-day deletion

Privileged content is never logged. Deleted matters go after 30 days.

Pilots add a signed DPA recording the no-retention, no-training terms, with single sign-on by agreement with your firm.

Book a demo

Start a three-month pilot on your own matters

A small number of first pilots with MDL coordinating counsel and mass-tort trial partners, on your own live matters, with a direct line to the founder.

What a pilot looks like
Scope
Your named mattersUsually four to eight live matters, your choice. Anyone at the firm can use it.
Timeline
Three monthsOne expert-disclosure cycle, success criteria agreed up front. No auto-renewal.
Price
$2,500 to $5,000Fifty to a hundred credits at $50 each, usable firm-wide, never expiring. Full pricing.
Data
Whatever the matter allowsPublic record by default, plus protective-order and AEO material where the order permits a vendor. Nothing retained or trained on. Security & trust.
Access
Direct founder lineAn hour of onboarding per user, two founder hours a week, and priority on your requests.