Supreme MindSupreme Mind
ExpertsSecuritiesAntitrustCommercialHow It WorksPricingSecurity
Sign InBook a DemoStart Free

Civil rights expert witnesses

Expert class library · 4 classes

The police practices, corrections, medical and interrogation experts in civil rights cases: use of force, training and supervision, care in custody and coerced confessions.

Each class is defined by role and method, never by a person or a firm. Open one for what it is retained to answer, how its testimony is attacked under Rule 702, and the rulings, each read in the opinion.

Usually retained by plaintiffs

Correctional healthcare standards expert

Review of medical records, sick-call requests and grievances · Comparison of intake screening and care with NCCHC and ACA standards

False confession and interrogation expert

Review of interrogation recordings, transcripts and police reports · Identification of interrogation techniques such as isolation, confrontation and minimization

Retained by either side

Police use-of-force practices expert

Use-of-force continuum and policy comparison · POST training standard review

Eyewitness identification expert

Review of identification procedures, such as show-ups, photo arrays and lineups · Analysis of estimator variables such as stress, lighting, distance, weapon focus and cross-race effects

Recent rulings

The 12 most recent of 14 rulings in this practice, newest first. Each links to the free opinion on CourtListener and to the class it belongs to.

OutcomeCaseCourtExpert class
ExcludedState v. Huante2026 S.D. 6S.D. 2026False confession and interrogation expert
ExcludedOllison v. Gossett136 F.4th 7297th Cir. 2025Correctional healthcare standards expert
ExcludedState v. ColettaNo. 2022-35-C.A.R.I. 2025False confession and interrogation expert
Exclusion reversedHyer v. City and County of Honolulu118 F.4th 10449th Cir. 2024Police use-of-force practices expert
Exclusion reversedTekoh v. County of Los Angeles91 F.4th 9979th Cir. 2024False confession and interrogation expert
Exclusion reversedZaragoza v. Wexford of Indiana, LLCNo. 23S-CT-99Ind. 2024Correctional healthcare standards expert
AdmittedUnited States v. ZabavskyCriminal No. 21-0598D.D.C. 2022Police use-of-force practices expert
Exclusion reversedState v. CarpenterNo. SC98088Mo. 2020Eyewitness identification expert
ExcludedState v. Dobbs2020 WI 64Wis. 2020False confession and interrogation expert
ExcludedEstate of Collins v. Wilburn253 F. Supp. 3d 989E.D. Ky. 2017Police use-of-force practices expert
AdmittedEstate of Thomas v. Fayette County194 F. Supp. 3d 358W.D. Pa. 2016Correctional healthcare standards expert
ExcludedUnited States v. Redwood216 F. Supp. 3d 890N.D. Ill. 2016Eyewitness identification expert

Other practice areas

  • Securities
  • Antitrust
  • Commercial
  • Intellectual property
  • Mass tort and product liability
  • Environmental and toxic tort
  • Personal injury
  • Transportation
  • Employment
  • Consumer class actions
  • Medical malpractice
  • Product engineering
  • Forensic science
  • Healthcare fraud and False Claims Act
  • Family law
  • Insurance
  • Construction
  • Bankruptcy and valuation
Simulate any of these experts on your matter.Start freeRead a sample brief →

The library summarises public decisions for orientation; it is not legal advice. Read the opinion before relying on any ruling. No individual expert is named.

Supreme MindSupreme Mind
Simulate any expert, on any matter,
from case intake to settlement
Follow on LinkedInFollow on X
Practice Areas
  • Securities
  • Antitrust
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury & Med Mal
  • All Practice Areas
Resources
  • Expert Class Library
  • Guides
  • Rule 702 Tracker
  • Sample Brief
  • Walkthrough
  • Research
Product
  • Start Free
  • Book a Demo
  • How It Works
  • Pricing
  • Pilots
  • API
  • Security & Trust
  • FAQ
Company
  • About
  • Why Now
  • The Fourth Institution
  • Contact
© 2026 Supreme Mind AI, Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy