Healthcare fraud and False Claims Act expert witnesses
Expert class library · 2 classes
The statisticians, coders and clinical reviewers in False Claims Act and healthcare fraud cases: sampling, extrapolation and medical necessity.
Each class is defined by role and method, never by a person or a firm. Open one for what it is retained to answer, how its testimony is attacked under Rule 702, and the rulings, each read in the opinion.
Retained by either side
Recent rulings
The 6 rulings in this practice, newest first. Each links to the free opinion on CourtListener and to the class it belongs to.
| Outcome | Case | Court | Expert class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admitted | Rupp v. Premier Health Partners2025-Ohio-985 | Ohio Ct. App. 2025 | Medical coding and billing auditor |
| Admitted | Grant v. Zorn107 F.4th 782 | 8th Cir. 2024 | FCA statistical sampling and extrapolation expert |
| Admitted | United States v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.933 F.3d 468 | 5th Cir. 2019 | FCA statistical sampling and extrapolation expert |
| Limited | United States v. Long Grove Manor, Inc.315 F. Supp. 3d 1107 | N.D. Ill. 2018 | FCA statistical sampling and extrapolation expert |
| Admitted | United States v. Brown871 F.3d 352 | 5th Cir. 2017 | Medical coding and billing auditor |
| Limited | United States ex rel. Johnson v. Golden Gate National Senior Care, L.L.C.223 F. Supp. 3d 882 | D. Minn. 2016 | Medical coding and billing auditor |
Other practice areas
- Securities
- Antitrust
- Commercial
- Intellectual property
- Mass tort and product liability
- Personal injury
- Employment
- Consumer class actions
- Product engineering
- Insurance
- Construction
- Bankruptcy and valuation
The library summarises public decisions for orientation; it is not legal advice. Read the opinion before relying on any ruling. No individual expert is named.